
So the BBC has this 10 Things We Didn’t Know This Time Last Week page on Ceefax and, it turns out, on their web site. Sometimes it mentions some recent scientific discovery of tremendous import, but mostly it’s amusing trivia. I think that link may change during the week, but today it said this:
In a fight between a polar bear and a lion, the polar bear would win.
Intrigued, I followed the link to the citation, which was also on the BBC’s site. So it must be true, right? Hmm.
It turns out that this snippet of information came from their report on IssueBits’ new Any Question Answered service. The premise of this service being that you send them a text message with a question in it and then they charge you a pound and send you a text message with the answer. Neat!
The only mention of the polar bear question is this:
There are other questions which are clearly about settling an argument. Such as ‘If a polar bear and a lion had a fight who would win?’ A polar bear, generally you don’t want to come up against a bear.
Now, I truly wouldn’t want to come up against a bear. The polar bear is assuredly a fierce and powerful predator and twice the weight of a lion. But I wondered at the science of this. How many instances of lion/polar bear combat do they have to draw on? I’m betting probably none. Lions don’t exactly look a pushover, do they? And I bet the average lion has quicker reflexes than a bear, which would be handy. They also fail to stipulate the venue for this contest. On the baking African savannah, a polar bear would rapidly overheat, whereas the Arctic icecap would provide poor footing for a lion.
Obviously this wasn’t a question I could answer alone. But for £1, I could call upon the resources of AQA and solve my quandary! Thus:
What is your source for that polar bear versus lion question, as featured on the BBC? I find it hard to believe such a contest has ever taken place.
The answer came back (a mere six minutes later, despite the early hour):
AQA uses statistics of found information, and deducts the most possible outcome, on such occasions. When asked to speculate, that is all AQA can do.
I assume they mean “deduces” rather than “deducts”, and will forgive them both that and their clumsy grammar, but the point seems to be that they made it up. That’s pretty shoddy service for a quid, if you ask me.
Anyway, if you have a question in need of answering, Chiara has pointed out the excellent Question Swap web site, where you can trade questions and answers with other web site users. It’s probably no more or less accurate than AQA (or spending five minutes on google or wikipedia for that matter) and doesn’t cost a pound a go.

Meanwhile, I’m offering a bounty of one British Pound Sterling to anyone who does know who would win in a fight between a polar bear and a lion, and can back it up with firm scientific evidence. Or at least with an impressively entertaining lie.